While loading (LDR X5, ullPortInterruptNestingConst) the ullPortInterruptNesting
variable, the program control seems to be stuck and there is no abort or stack
trace observed (as there is no exception handler is installed to catch unaligned
access exception).
Program control moves forward, if one just declares this varible to be 2 bytes
aligned but then varible is not updated properly.
One of my colleague, pointed out that issue is due to the fact that
ullPortInterruptNesting must be at 8 bytes aligned address but since
"vApplicationIRQHandler" (that has 4 bytes of address) is sitting between
two 8 bytes aligned addresses that forces ullPortInterruptNesting to be at
4 byte aligned address, causing all sort of mess.
It works on QEMU (on ARM64) as it is, since there is no such check for
unaligned access but on real hardware it is prohibited.
Workaround to this problem is, either we skip 4 byets (using .align 4) after
vApplicationIRQHandler declaration or declare it the end of all declarations.
This commit does the latter one.
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <atomar25opensource@gmail.com>
* Adjust portPOINTER_SIZE_TYPE to correct size
portPOINTER_SIZE_TYPE wasn't yet set correctly to be 16 bit
* Fixed FreeRTOS file header to comply with automatic checks
Co-authored-by: Cobus van Eeden <35851496+cobusve@users.noreply.github.com>
The tick interrupt priority must be configured to ensure that it cannot
interrupt a critical section. This change updates the comment to help
the application writer while debugging.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
* Add an LCOV_BRANCH exception for the check that sizeof( StaticQueue_t ) == sizeof( Queue_t )
* Add LCOV_BRANCH coverage exception for a configASSERT on pxQueueSetContainer with a condition that is unreachable.
* Add configASSERTs to alert when invalid parameters are passed into Queue Registry related functions.
* Assert that the semaphore handle passed into xQueueGetMutexHolder is not NULL.
* Correct some typos in queue.c
* Update lexicon.txt
The change adds support for allocating task stacks from separate heap.
When configSTACK_ALLOCATION_FROM_SEPARATE_HEAP is defined as 1 in
FreeRTOSConfig.h, task stacks are allocated and freed using
pvPortMallocStack and vPortFreeStack functions. This allows the
application writer to provide a separate allocator for task stacks.
When configSTACK_ALLOCATION_FROM_SEPARATE_HEAP is defined as 0, task
stacks are allocated and freed using FreeRTOS heap functions
pvPortMalloc and vPortFree.
For backward compatibility, configSTACK_ALLOCATION_FROM_SEPARATE_HEAP
defaults to 0.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
* Update URL in history.txt
* Configure CI header checker to ignore .txt files
Co-authored-by: alfred gedeon <28123637+alfred2g@users.noreply.github.com>
* Revert "Reintroduce Espressif's IDF v4.2 changes to ESP32 port (#193)"
This reverts commit 3d4d17178f.
* Update ESP32 port files to work with ESP-IDF v4.2 as well as ESP-IDF v3.3
Add changes required to support ESP32-S2
* portmacro.h: Change return type of vApplicationSleep to void
This fixes build failure when automatic light sleep is enabled
* prevent header checks for files with different licensing
Co-authored-by: David Chalco <david@chalco.io>
* decouple kernel check configs from fr/fr + checker sources from PR ref
* Combo of various small edits
* enable compatibility with git action + create autorelease action
This change removes the FreeRTOS System Calls (aka MPU wrappers) for the
following kernel APIs:
- xTaskCreateRestricted
- xTaskCreateRestrictedStatic
- vTaskAllocateMPURegions
A system call allows an unprivileged task to execute a kernel API which
is otherwise accessible to privileged software only. The above 3 APIs
can create a new task with a different MPU configuration or alter the
MPU configuration of an existing task. This an be (mis)used by an
unprivileged task to grant itself access to a region which it does not
have access to.
Removing the system calls for these APIs ensures that an unprivileged
task cannot execute this APIs. If an unprivileged task attempts to
execute any of these API, it will result in a Memory Fault.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aggarwal <aggarg@amazon.com>
