devs/foxbox
1
0
Fork 0
forked from len0rd/rockbox
Code Pull requests Activity

added question about boot loader

Browse source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.rockbox.org/rockbox/trunk@1130 a1c6a512-1295-4272-9138-f99709370657
This commit is contained in:
Robert Hak 2002-06-21 05:28:41 +00:00
parent 926b4c590d
commit fe98041a81
1 changed files with 11 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
www/docs/FAQ
View file

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Copyright (C) 2002 by Robert E. Hak
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rockbox FAQ
@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ A29: Don't confuse the terms. Reverse engineering means examining a product
software without first researching the surrounding interfaces, then no
software has ever been written from scratch.
Q30: Wait a minute here. You have release version 1.0, but not a single one
Q30: Wait a minute here. You have released version 1.0, but not a single one
of the ideas you have spoken about is actually implimented! Calling this
version 1.0 is really misleading. Whats the story?!
A30: In simple terms, the first release is called 1.0 because it has a basic
@ -244,3 +244,12 @@ A30: In simple terms, the first release is called 1.0 because it has a basic
bring the project some attention, and some additional developers.
Adding the missing features is just a matter of time (and that time goes
faster if you, yes you, help too).
Q31: I've heard talk of a 'Rolo'. What is that? (Or 'All you ever wanted
to know about Rockbox boot loaders')
A31: The developers have discussed the possibility of a boot loader. (Mainly
because having one sounds cool, and isn't Rolo just a great name?)
The idea would be that a user could use the load to choose between
different verions of Rockbox or the Archo firmware itself. We do not
have an expected date on this. (As a matter of fact, developement on it
has not even started yet).